Browse by tag

    Did the Romans really have a “vomitorium” for throwing up?

    No. A vomitorium was a passageway for spectators in an amphitheater, not a room for vomiting.

    80entrances

    Number of ground-level entrances to the Colosseum

    When the nobles of ancient Rome had eaten their fill at a banquet, the story goes, they withdrew to a room called a vomitorium, threw up, and returned to the table to keep eating. You may have heard it in a trivia book or on television. It is still widely told as proof of the luxury and decadence of the Roman Empire.

    Historians, however, shake their heads firmly at this one. The vomitorium was real enough. It just wasn’t a place for vomiting.

    The crowd was what got “spewed out”

    Vomitorium (plural vomitoria) is built from the Latin verb vomere, “to spew forth,” plus an ending that marks a place. It is indeed a relative of the English word “vomit,” but what it named was a passageway beneath or behind the tiers of seats in an amphitheater or theater.

    The classic example is Rome’s Colosseum. This enormous arena, which is estimated to have held 50,000 to 80,000 people, had 80 entrances at ground level, 76 of them for ordinary spectators. Entrances and staircases were numbered, and spectators followed numbered tickets to their sections. The openings where the passages emerged into the seating were the vomitoria, and when a show ended, the huge crowd poured out through them all at once. It is said that everyone could leave within a few minutes.

    A staircase rising toward the seating under a vaulted stone ceiling in a passage of the Colosseum
    A surviving vomitorium in the Colosseum. Visitors still climb these stairs under the vaulted ceiling to reach the seats.Source: Paolo Villa / CC BY-SA 4.0 / Wikimedia Commons

    It is a vivid name, comparing a building to a mouth spewing out a tide of people.

    No “vomiting room” in ancient texts

    Only one surviving ancient text is known to use the word as the name of a place: the Saturnalia of Macrobius, a writer of the late fourth or early fifth century. Explaining a line by the poet Virgil about a house that “spews out” a wave of morning visitors, Macrobius notes that this is also where the vomitoria at public shows get their name. Once again, it is about the flow of people.

    No ancient record, on the other hand, describes a room for throwing up after a feast.

    Still, some Romans did throw up

    Does that mean Romans never vomited at banquets? Not quite. The historian Suetonius reports that the emperor Claudius would eat and drink until he was stuffed, fall asleep on his back, and have a feather put down his throat to relieve his stomach. The statesman Cicero mentioned in a letter that Julius Caesar, when he dined at Cicero’s country house, was in the middle of a course of emetics.

    The philosopher Seneca, writing to his mother from exile, savaged rich men who gorged on delicacies fetched from distant lands: “They vomit so that they may eat, and eat so that they may vomit.”

    But these passages describe the habits of particular people, vomiting as a medical treatment, or moral criticism that may well exaggerate in order to condemn luxury. None of them points to a dedicated room.

    When did the myth begin?

    Using vomitorium to mean “a room for vomiting” is a modern development. The Oxford English Dictionary cites, as an early example of this sense, Antic Hay, a 1923 novel by the English writer Aldous Huxley. Some have pointed out that the confusion can already be found in 19th-century writing.

    An oil painting of ancient Romans reclining at a feast while countless rose petals rain down on them
    Lawrence Alma-Tadema, The Roses of Heliogabalus (1888). Nineteenth-century painters portrayed Roman banquets as lavish, decadent spectacles.Source: Lawrence Alma-Tadema / Public domain / Wikimedia Commons

    The word looks like it should mean vomiting, and 19th-century paintings and novels had already cast the Romans as people drowning in luxury. Together, these probably made the story seem believable. Seneca’s biting line, quoted again and again out of context, seems to have come to be read as a habit of all Romans.

    Read next

    1. History4 minWhy did samurai wear the chonmage topknot?The familiar samurai hairstyle from period dramas: the top of the head shaved, the rest tied into a topknot. Come to think of it, why shave just part of your head?
    2. History4 minWhat is the oldest money in Japan?Generations of Japanese students learned one coin as “Japan’s oldest money.” Then a single excavation shook its claim to the title.
    3. History3 minWhich is older, Oxford University or the Aztec Empire?Stone temples on one side, a university students still attend on the other. Asked which is older, most people’s instincts lead them astray.
    4. History3 minDid people in the past really die young?Hear that life expectancy in Edo-period Japan was in the thirties, and it sounds as if 40 was already old age. But was it really?
    5. History4 minDid Vikings really wear horned helmets?Norse warriors who crossed the seas and raided far and wide. Where did the fierce helmet we picture on their heads actually come from?
    6. History4 minDid ninja really dress all in black?A shadowy figure in black, melting into the night and racing silently across the rooftops. How much of the world’s favorite image of the ninja is true?
    7. History4 minWere the pyramids built by slaves?Overseers cracking whips over crowds of slaves dragging huge stones. That scene is familiar from the movies, but did it ever really happen?
    8. History4 minWas Napoleon really short?His name is still shorthand for the short man with big ambitions. But the record of his height hides a surprising trap.